• Today is Hexennacht, a solemn holiday meant to reflect on and remember the victims of superstition. This year brought us an early gift in the form of the death of Bennett Braun, whose fraudulent “psychiatry” practices were a chief influence on the Satanic Panic of the 80s and 90s. Many lives were irreparably broken, families torn apart, and lives ended due to his self-serving lies.

    In the early 1990s, the FBI investigated and found no evidence of coordinated cult activity in the United States, Satanic or otherwise. A separate report by the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect looked at over 12,000 claims of satanic ritual abuse, and found not a single claim held up. Braun’s actions cannot even be excused as “the wrong thing for the right reason” – there was no reason, and there is no justification for what he did.

    To honor his victims both past and present – as we are still undeniably feeling the effects of the Satanic Panic he so eagerly championed – I’d like to share this Frontline documentary from 1995. In it you’ll hear two of Braun’s victims, Mary Shanley and Pat Burgus, tell the story of how they and their families suffered under his so-called “treatment.”

    (Please bear with the audio quality in the beginning, it improves a few minutes in.)

    Frontline – The Search for Satan (1995)

    Although Braun is no longer able to inflict harm upon our society, those who would follow in his footsteps are champing at the bit for their turn. From the spread of false AI-generated memes of “demonic” displays at popular stores, to accusations of celebrities engaging in satanic rituals, to using Baphomet to attempt to associate transgender people with demons, it has never been more clear that the Satanic Panic never actually ended. It was merely dormant for a while, and those who would bear false witness to it are more energized than they have been in decades.

    So this Hexennacht, not only do I honor those whose lives were irreparably altered by the Satanic Panic in days past, I also want to honor the future victims who some among us seem hungry to create. The best way to do so, I believe, is to fight those who would perpetrate it on every front.

    For those who feel safe doing so, I urge you to be open about your lack of faith, your atheism, your Satanism, your non-Abrahamic religious beliefs. Make visible, whenever possible, the already pluralistic nature of our society. Do not just give a pass to harmful supernaturalist beliefs, but scoff and openly mock them instead. Deny proselytizers the opportunity to force you to say grace before meals, return religiously-coded gifts that they give, refuse to allow unsupervised visits with your children to those who insist on exposing them to religious indoctrination against your wishes. Fight against school chaplain and voucher programs which steal public money for religious use. Call people idiots for believing obvious AI-generated fiction meant to demonize your fellow humans. These bad actors do not feel shame spreading lies and forcing their religion on others, so you need feel no shame putting them in their place.

    If you do not feel safe or comfortable being so direct, seek out charities that do good work in this space. Donate to them if you can, join a local chapter if they have one, or just spread the word about them to others. Even the smallest act is helpful. No single drop of water is responsible for creating a flood, but together they become unstoppable. This Hexennacht, be a drop in the flood.

    Some charities I find helpful are below. I encourage you to see if they align with your values, and donate to or share those which appeal to you.

    The Satanic Panic may be returning, but this time we have the benefit of past experience, and the ability to see it coming. Let’s bring the fight to them.

    Hail Satan! 🤘

    Photo Credit: Fool4myCanon via Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

  • Dune takes place in a world steeped in religion. At its forefront is a warning of the way religion can be used to control societies, which makes it ripe for lessons on how people and societies can respond. I don’t see The Litany Against Fear often cited as one, but I think it can be taken as both a warning against religious manipulation, and a mantra for escaping it.

    I’ll admit it: I’ve never read Dune, or watched the David Lynch film. My only direct exposure is Part 1 of Villeneuve’s version, the rest is what has filtered to me through culture. The Litany Against Fear is one of those parts, and some good old fashioned “high thoughts” philosophizing I came to see it as a filter for viewing attitudes around and within evangelicalism, atheism, and Satanism.

    I must not fear.
    Fear is the mind-killer.
    Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
    I will face my fear.
    I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
    And when it has gone past, I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
    Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

    Frank Herbert, Dune

    Fear may be the most powerful emotion a human has. It can make us abandon our principles, betray our loved ones, perform acts we would consider abhorrent if fear were not manipulating us. And this makes fear a useful tool for those seeking to control others.

    I know I’m not revealing some grand secret of the universe here. But it’s been on my mind because of how prevalent fear-based manipulation seems to be today. With all of the irrational, largely hate-based arguments on everything from fear of the government, to fear of immigrants, to fear of losing cultural relevance, it appears that the evangelical right in this country has lost their damn minds.

    They’ve lost their minds to fear. Because fear is the emotional version of a “thought-terminating cliche,” those handy phrases that people like to toss out to end a conversation rather than confront it. They will say “I’m entitled to my opinion” or “god works in mysterious ways” to protect themselves from facing their fear of the unknown, or the fear that they might be wrong. These are almost passive responses, deployed without much if any conscious thought. Mantras made to guide one’s thoughts away from thinking. (And indeed another favorite is “you think too much.”)

    This is why much of their screaming appears to be nonsense. From drivel about kneeling being disrespectful when it’s a historical sign of deference, to fear of celebrities literally being controlled by demons, the reason it doesn’t make sense is because fear has killed their minds.

    They’ll never admit it’s fear controlling them, because fear comes from deep in the subconscious. Our lizard brains are ill equipped to bring context to it because in prehistoric times the context was obvious. A creeping set of eyes in the dark, a lunging predator, a raging wildfire. We needed instinct to survive these threats; “thinking too much” would only get in the way. But when a fear is more existential than immediate, and especially when it’s invented and imposed on us by others, our conscious brain is left grasping to make sense of the source. And our brains are incredibly efficient at finding patterns to make sense of what we’re experiencing, even when no such patterns exist.

    When a person is in this state of emotional turmoil, it takes only the slightest suggestion to direct their brain to whatever pattern an outsider wants them to find. They’ll tell you it’s immigrants, or transgender people, or an ambiguous concept like “woke” causing their fear. These excuses usually tap into fears that may already be present, like a fear that one’s culture or religion is being erased. And the fearful lizard brain overrides the rational, allowing it to be manipulated.

    Atheists certainly aren’t immune to being manipulated by fear either. I’m reading the book We of Little Faith by Kate Cohen, which was partly inspired by a news clip from 2013. After a tornado came through a town in Oklahoma leaving twenty-four dead and hundreds injured, Wolf Blitzer asked a woman whose house was destroyed about how lucky she felt to have evacuated and survived:

    “You gotta thank the Lord, right?” he asked. Vitsmum paused. Blitzer pushed: “Do you thank the Lord for that split-second decision?”

    “I’m actually an atheist,” she said.

    But, as Cohen points out, she didn’t quite say “I’m actually an atheist.” She paused, looked down, shrugged apologetically, and had to be prodded into answering. She stuttered, “I-I-I’m,” with a nervous chuckle. And after her admission, she said “I don’t blame anybody for thanking the Lord.”

    I’m not here to trash Vitsmun. Her response, while uncertain and deferential, was still brave. Oklahoma is in the “bible belt” after all, where revealing one’s self as an unbeliever can be harmful or dangerous. For all the talk of loving thy neighbor and hating sins but loving sinners, a great many Christians respond to unbelief with shunning, ostracization, even violence. And Vitsmun had just revealed her unbelief on the evening news with barely enough time to think about what she was doing.

    Evangelicals lash out against atheists to protect themselves from confronting their faith, and in turn that provokes our own fear. We very often hide ourselves so as not to make a scene. We call ourselves things like “not very religious.” We say things like “I was raised Catholic.” We use labels like “culturally Christian.” Anything to avoid even testing whether we might be bringing a Christian wrath upon us.

    Unlike the religious, atheists have no church, or leader, or central authority to help us oppose this. There is no unity in disbelief. There is no community to be found in the concept of not finding something true. When atheists do find community it’s not around disbelief, but around finding shared beliefs like humanism and Enlightenment principles. But these are not atheism, and not all atheists will seek out community around them or even ascribe to them.

    The result is that the evangelicals don’t take atheists seriously. The fact of our existence may threaten their belief system, but they believe they have an almighty power on their side. So when we cower and kowtow to them by hiding ourselves (and apologizing for it when we don’t), they believe we are showing them that we too fear their god.

    Christians don’t fear atheists. They do fear Satanists though. Modern Satanists are atheists, but that makes no difference to those immersed in doctrines made of fearful minds in darkened times. Those inclined to conspiratorial fears will insist that we do worship the devil, and that our insistence to the contrary is just a front. Others will accept our non-theism but still claim we are unknowingly being influenced by Satan to do his work. The greatest trick the devil ever pulled, as the saying goes, was convincing the world he didn’t exist.

    Just as fear is a powerful tool for churches to use to keep their followers in line, Satanism shows us this tool can also be used by the opposition. When a Florida school district spent months ignoring the Freedom From Religion Foundation’s requests to have atheist literature available in schools alongside the bibles that were already there, delaying proceedings until deadlines had passed in order to deny the atheists a voice, it took bringing in The Satanic Temple to make progress. (Scroll past the videos for the article.)

    This is partially because atheism isn’t a religion and so its protection under law, if any, is unclear. Satanism is a religion, so the law pays attention. But we often see Christians accept Jewish and, occasionally, other “mainstream” religious iconography. Religious protections only played a small part. What really got the bibles out of school was fear.

    I’m glad this tactic works, but when it does I can’t help but think that Christians must not believe their god is very powerful. They appear to think he can be defeated by a handful of people in t-shirts and jeans handing out coloring books. In their minds, their god is so threatened by Satan that they shirk at mere mention of the name, and they seem to have no confidence that their supposed holy text can survive the challenge of a word search or a connect-the-dots picture. How truly mighty Satan must be!

    And in a way he is. Because, despite being fictional, a great many ex-Christians find strength in the idea of invoking him in acts of “therapeutic blasphemy.” This is the power of the unbaptism ritual. One does not need to believe that Satan is real to derive strength from hailing him. For an ex-Christian to stand and proudly Hail Satan, to burn a page from a bible and be smudged with the ash, is not an act of rebellion directed at the faithful. The ritual is one of confronting one’s own fears – the deep-seated and existential ones that organized religion uses to control us. It is a breaking of chains.

    One of The Satanic Temple’s seminal texts, The Revolt of the Angels, ends with the statement that “we have destroyed [god] if in ourselves we have destroyed Ignorance and Fear.”

    The lesson of Revolt is what to do; the Litany Against Fear suggests a way to do it. In embracing Satan we face our fears born of religious ignorance. Blasphemous acts bring those fears forward. We permit the fear to pass over and through us, and when it has gone past, we allow our rational mind to see that nothing has come of it.

    We confront our irrational fear of god, and see that where the fear has gone there is nothing. Only we remain.

    Hail Satan. 🤘

  • I admit it, Samuel Alito’s Mom’s Satanic Abortion Clinic made me laugh (it still does). But if Satanic Abortion Clinics are going to become a thing and not just a one-off stunt, I’m not sure calling the next one “Mrs. Jerry Falwell Jr.’s Pool Boy’s Satanic Abortion Clinic” is helpful.

    The Satanic Temple announced a fundraiser today for a new Satanic Abortion Clinic. You can donate money to vote for one of four proposed names. This is the leader board as I write:

    Edit (March 7th): Since posting, the leader board has changed significantly. The “Mrs. Jerry Falwell” choice swapped places with “Right to Your Life,” but the dollar totals didn’t. Since then “Right” has been in a clear lead above the other choices, including several new ones that are also, in my opinion, less childish. None so far have more than $1,700 vs “Right’s” nearly $7000.

    As much as I do love a good sarcastic jab (and believe me I do), I have to think about the balance between the drive to make a statement with the name, and not making the whole thing seem desperately un-serious.

    Some people who could genuinely use the help of a Satanic Abortion Clinic will inevitably be driven away by any Satanic reference in the name, and that’s ok. But I’d hate for someone to avoid it simply because they believe it’s nothing more than a prank.

    “Right to Your Life Satanic Abortion Clinic” is on the right track for me. I like that it’s affirmative, and focused on the mother. I think my only complaint is that it looks like it should spell something as an acronym, but RYLSAC sounds awkward.

    In a desperate attempt to make an acronym, I spent far too long coming up with:

    Satanic Abortion Clinic Resplendent In Lucifer’s Everlasting Grace and Emancipation

    … or SACRILEGE for short.

    Here are some of my other favorite suggestions, shamelessly stolen from this thread on Reddit:

    • The Republicans Can’t Make Me Have This Baby Satanic Abortion Clinic
    • The Lilith Center for Women’s Empowerment and Reproductive Health
    • Third Tenet Medical Clinic
    • My Body, My Choice Clinic
    • TST’s My Choice Abortion Clinic

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not emotionally invested in this. Whatever name wins, so be it. But I think we can have a funny name that actually makes a point too. And I think being serious might make an even bigger statement.

  • I saw a comment a while back which described being “raised Satanist.” At first I was interested to hear about Satanic parenting. But I was even more interested when they said their parents were Christian. And I’ve been thinking about it ever since.

    Some excerpts from their comment:

    I was raised in an evangelical Christian cult and my basic desires in life were taught to me as Satanism. Playing D&D with my friends was practicing Satanism. Having sexual desires was Satan’s influence over me. Questioning the church? Straight up Satanism. Wanting to improve the world for all people equally? That’s a Satanism. Taking any of Jesus’ advice? That’s embracing Satan.

    Satanism was a derogatory classification meant to inspire fear and shame in me in order to stifle my righteous ethics and morals and steer me towards the work of the church.

    Today I’m simply out of the closet. I was always accused of being a Satanist, and now I’m a fully admitted one.

    This is one of the more interesting perspectives I’ve seen on embracing Satanism. I’m used to hearing stories of religious trauma leading people to seek out an escape from, or an alternative to, the abusive environment they grew up in. But that escape usually involves a rejection of the religious teachings, a casting off of the hatred, abuse, and manipulation, to be replaced with something where one can thrive.

    I had never considered this “if you say so” approach. Evangelical Christians, as the commenter points out, love to label anything and everything that offends them as “Satanic.” This isn’t just true today, but throughout history – before anyone voluntarily adopted Satanist as a label, it was mostly used by Christians to demean other Christians who they thought weren’t Christianing correctly. Everything from early Gnostics in the 1st Century CE to modern Catholics in the 2020s have been referred to as Satanic by other supposed Christians.

    But I didn’t have that early religious trauma, so while I can empathize with those who did, I lack a personal connection. This one, though? I have to admit, I’ve always found it immensely satisfying when a bad actor creates their own opposition. I think it’s the reason I’m a big fan of “malicious compliance” – the idea of following a stupid rule to the letter, just to prove the inevitable consequence. And I think that idea really speaks to the entire concept of modern Satanism, especially as practiced by The Satanic Temple.

    When Christians want a religious display on public grounds, TST wants Baphomet there. When Christians want an indoctrination club at a public school, TST wants the After School Satan Club to offer critical thinking instead. When Christians declare a religious right to ban abortion, TST is there to claim a religious right to have one. It’s malicious compliance on the Constitutional level, and I am very much here for it.

    The god of the bible, as the fables say, created Satan to be an adversary. So too do modern Christians create Satanists as their adversary. Some of them do it actively, like the parents of the anonymous commenter who very literally declared it into being. Others passively, by remaining silent and doing nothing while their compatriots work to implement the Christian version of Sharia Law, inspiring many to voluntarily take up the banner of the most obvious opposing force. (If any of you quiet ones are reading this, make no mistake – they’ll be calling you the Satanists next, just like they did in the past.)

    It’s been said that if you can’t set a good example, you can at least serve as a horrible warning. The last time there was a Satanic Panic, Christians got to control the narrative and they ruined a lot of lives in the process. They’ve already given us our horrible warning. Time for the rest of us to be the good example.

    Hail Satan. 🤘

  • According to a 7-2 ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court, embryos are now legally “children.” Terrifyingly, the ruling mentions “god” no less than 41 times. Some are eager to dismiss this as the dying gasps of religion. But to the evangelicals, it’s a Holy War.

    I’ll let FFRF sum it up:

    It is hard to think of a more un-American ruling than the concurrence by Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Tom Parker. In his theology-drenched concurring opinion, Parker openly cites religion and the bible: “The theologically based view of the sanctity of life adopted by the People of Alabama encompasses the following: God made every person in His image; each person therefore has a value that far exceeds the ability of human beings to calculate; and human life cannot be wrongfully destroyed without incurring the wrath of a holy God, who views the destruction of His image as an affront to Himself.”

    Freedom From Religion Foundation, 20 Feb 2024

    What can be learned from this? Very little that we didn’t already know. The most important, I think, is to realize that when these Christian nationalist theocrats tell you that they aren’t coming for birth control next, that gay marriage is settled law, or that they respect literally anyone – they are lying.

    … no preference shall be given by law to any religious sect, society, denomination, or mode of worship …

    Alabama State Constitution, Section 3

    They will stop at nothing, and they will feel justified the entire time, because to them this is a Holy War. God matters more to them than their Country, more than laws, more than any principles they claim to have, more than any concept of individual rights.

    The same day as this ruling, Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Tom Parker appeared on a QAnon podcast to push the “Seven Mountain Mandate” which “asserts that Christians must impose fundamentalist values on American society by conquering the “seven mountains” of cultural influence in U.S. life: government, education, media, religion, family, business, and entertainment.” (Media Matters)

    We can clearly see their efforts to conquer government. Good News Clubs and the deceptively named “Moms For Liberty” are openly assaulting our schools, as well as voucher programs that threaten to redirect public school funding to religious organizations. They have left behind media platforms like Fox News and Twitter that carried water for them, in favor of more extremist versions. The Christian Educational Media Foundation is taking over our airways, replacing diverse music with a bland, regressive, and discriminatory selection of religious “rock” across the nation.

    Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can’t and won’t compromise. I know, I’ve tried to deal with them.

    Barry Goldwater

    It’s no wonder that Satanism is on the rise in this country. To many people today, Christianity is a symbol of authoritarianism, misogyny, lying, theft, hypocrisy, egregious displays of wealth, protection of child r*pists, and all manner of evil behavior.

    If that is what the Church stands for today, then it should be no surprise that people will find inspiration in the image of The Adversary, the Great Rebel who defied god himself in defense of the freedom of humankind.

    Hail Satan. 🤘

  • Some new members of The Satanic Temple hold on to supernatural beliefs (often around demons) while calling themselves a Satanist. And some well-meaning Satanists encourage them, believing Satanism is both welcoming enough and laissez-faire enough to accommodate these beliefs.

    This is often accompanied by a statement like “we don’t gatekeep.” A noble idea in theory, but I have to ask: are the core, foundational beliefs of a religion not worth gatekeeping?


    (Note: When I say “Satanist” or “Satanism” I’m referring to the sect that The Satanic Temple teaches; if I mean some other type of Satanism, I’ll specify.)

    At its most basic, modern Satanism is built on an interpretation of Satan having delivered mankind from slavery by giving us the gift of knowledge. This belief is non-theistic, treating Satan is the completely fictional character that he is. The non-theistic approach is part of a general rejection of supernatural belief, honoring the Luciferian gift of knowledge and reason.

    This is expressed in Tenet V, which says:

    Beliefs should conform to one’s best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific fact to fit one’s beliefs.

    It’s also shown in TST’s standard invocation, which calls us to:

    …reason our solutions with agnosticism in all things, holding fast only to that which is demonstrably true.

    It’s even echoed in the symbolism of Baphomet, who wears the Torch of Knowledge between his horns. This torch is used by many universities and educational institutions, because the flame symbolizes knowledge, study, teaching, and reason eradicating the darkness of ignorance.

    Beyond the religious basis, rejection of the supernatural is at the core of TST’s advocacy too. The founders have spent time both in public and in court fighting against the idea that “religion” belongs solely to the superstitious. To recognize any superstitious belief as valid would undermine the advocacy entirely.

    It should be self-evident that anyone professing to believe in the existence of demons, or ghosts, or spirits, or any supernatural being is not actually following the religion of Satanism – at least, not as TST defines it.

    If we offer too much silent assent about mysticism and superstition – even when it seems to be doing a little good – we abet a general climate in which scepticism is considered impolite, science tiresome, and rigorous thinking somehow stuffy and inappropriate.

    Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

    Hail Satan. 🤘